“Lipstick on a pig” is probably one of the more disgusting phrases that has made it into common usage. Leave it to one of the most off-putting, obnoxious individuals in financial television, Rick Santelli, to give us a quintessential example of this tasteless descriptor of putting a smiley face on a bad situation.
Today’s main “taper topic” was the August employment report and how it could impact Fed decision-making. The consensus estimate for job additions was 180,000. The number came in at 169,000 (the whispered number was 200,000). It was a miss, not big one, but still a miss.
Oh the wailing and the gnashing of teeth, none was more outspoken than Mr.Santelli, CNBC’s bond savant. To demonstrate, I’m an attaching two links: one to a Santelli piece, and a second link to a debate (rant) with economics editor Steve Liesman (one of the network’s more balanced and knowledgeable presenters).
In the first clip Santelli attacks Secretary of Labor, Thomas Perez, for his more positive interpretation of the data (i.e. lipstick on pig) (Santelli Exchange) . In the second he attacks Liesman’s assertion that “Baby Boomer” retirements may be understating the labor force participation rate. He also believes retired “Boomers” won’t have spending money with which to support the economy. Rick, please tell my wife!
These reports were hard to watch. Both were typical Santelli, misleading and downright mean spirited (obnoxious, if you consider the L.O.A.P reference).
Santelli went after the labor participation rate. At 63.2% it is the lowest in 35 years. This rate includes retirees. When workers retire they are counted among those who are no longer looking for work. This is idiotic. When they leave the employable pool, assuming employment remains the same, the unemployment rate goes down, which it did (from 7.4% to 7.3%). Santelli calls this bogus, because it reflects both discouraged workers and retirees (all he believes to be indigent) who leave the pool.
Liesman was trying to argue (before Santelli shouted him down) that 10,000 “Boomers” reach retirement age every day (about 3.65 million per year). Many don’t retire, but if only 1.2 million retire each year that would be a monthly 100,000 subtraction from the pool. When you consider this, the 169,000 new jobs and 63.2% labor participation rate doesn’t look so bad. “Lipstick on a pig?” I think not.
Santelli’s ‘lipstick’ remarks are not funny. His assertions do not accurately reflect the current U.S. economy. This has been a constant in his work. Finally, his lack of civility is not conducive to true debate or understanding.
What do you think?
PS. The Heartland got the bad news Saturday, September 7…K. C. Star (my hometown paper) lead story–“AUGUST JOBS REPORT/Gains smaller than expected–TEPID HIRING CLOUDS PICTURE
Fed could be less likely to curb stimulus. Unemployment dips to 7.3% because people quit looking.”
The information presented in kortsessions.com represents my own opinions and does not contain recommendations for any particular investment or securities. I may, from time to time, mention certain securities for illustrative purpose, names where I personally hold positions. These are not meant to be construed as recommendations to BUY or SELL. All investments and strategies should be undertaken only after careful consideration of suitability based on the risks, tolerance for risk and personal financial situation.
4 thoughts on “Session 57— “Lipstick On a Pig””
We cannot get people to work at the office.Unemployment problem for business owners!
Yes,there are employment opportunities out there, not enough trained applicants to do them, especially in technical fields. Education really a big issue for U.S.
It is true that GDP has not increased as fast as we would like, but it has increased!
It is true that unemployment has not fallen as much as we would like, but it has fallen!
The truth. as I see it, is that the people who are responsible for our most recent recession now stand in the way of more rapid recovery while blaming others for the moderate nature of the recovery and deny their responsibility. They plead their innocence and continue to spread their economic dogma with bucks that people like Santelli, Keirnan, Maria Cabrera Caruso, Charles Payne and the whole FOX gang, etc., gladly accept to spread their elitist gospel of trickle down economics. Maybe they never got past Adam Smith and the ” invisible hand”
Anyway…you asked what I think.
Hard to get to 3+% GDP growth on monetary policy alone, but 2 to 2.5% isn’t too bad considering brakes are on the fiscal policy side and the media continuing to present the country in some sort of quagmire.
Comments are closed.